找一篇关于中国食品卫生状况的英语文章(内详)急!!

中国最近不是查处鸡蛋有问题吗??就这一问题讨论中国现在卫生状况,要英文版的,有的话希望直接发文章,别发连接之类的,谢了。

三鹿之后,民族食品业的未来在哪里?

实际上,关于中国食品的卫生状况,我们每天生活在这个大环境中,心知肚明,只是我们不愿意承认或者压根就不计较罢了。随便走在哪里的街头,都有许多街边板面摊、麻辣烫,五花八门,但有两个共同的特点,一个是食品的成分不明,一个是卫生状况待考。但是,你见过一个农民工吃碗板面还计较干净不干净,卫生不卫生的么?你见过一个小学生吃个麻辣烫,问过那些衣脏手黑的大妈是否洗手的吗?

稍微上点档次,去饭馆,如果你无意中上厕所误入厨房(他们是那样的像,都有一个脏不啦讥的半截门帘),你会对他们送上来的光鲜饭菜顿失胃口。当然,我们也有一些高档饭馆,但是你能每天去那里吃饭吗?在某种意义上,我更信任那种看起来相对还算干净的肯德基餐厅。

这就是我们的处境,所以发生食品污染也是情理中的事,三鹿这个倒霉蛋不过是及时为大家佐证了这一点而已,从这方面说,我们还要感谢三鹿。三鹿事件只是解开了奶企的一个潜规则,其他食品行业的潜规则不知还有多少?我武断的判断,比三聚氰胺更惊人的存在绝对不再少数。什么是潜规则?中国人似乎最懂,又似乎最不懂。有时想想,我们中国人可能最聪明,也可能最傻。

落入此等境地,是我们的食品卫生监管不够吗?事实上恰恰相反,我们有众多的食品监管部门,质检、卫生,甚至还有畜牧、园林部门插手。但是我们缺少了最关键的一个东西,就是市场自身的监管。虽然我们表面上已经改革开放三十年了,但是身在其中的我们,应该会处处发现计划经济的痕迹。

我们的免检制度就是这样的一个产物,我不知道凭什么质监部门可以根据他们的一次或者几次检查判断这个企业以后可以生产出永远合格的奶粉?凭什么给一家家企业高挂免检牌?是出于质检部门对企业的信任吗?显然不是。如果是那样的话,也太可笑了。中国的政府部门都是双刃剑,一面是一个样,翻过去又是一个样。所以,质检部门既有偷懒的嫌疑,也有权利过度开发的嫌疑。可以用同样的道理解读卫生部门,他们对免检可能深恶痛绝,也可能拍手欢迎。

在这种尴尬之下,最可能的情况是政府部门对企业的监管过度,相信企业也很为难,在这种情况,市场的作用微乎其微。之所以发生这种情况,与我们的企业在推向市场后还刻有深深的国有烙印不无关系。在三鹿事发后,看看田文华的身份,三鹿集团原董事长、总经理之外是集团党委书记,在这种身份下,政府和企业的关系十分微妙。

在当前市场经济体制下,这两种计划经济痕迹严重影响了企业在市场中采取什么样的竞争手段,但是他可以无视市场的作用吗?那只会招来市场的无情报复。三鹿事件,就像打开了潘多拉之盒,整个民族奶企被推上风口浪尖,政府的问责力度一步步加强,推而广及所有食品行业,所有行业的免检被取消。这即有市场的力量作用,也昭示了时代的进步。今日看到的消息,石家庄市委书记、国家质检总局总长被免职。三鹿事件与山西溃坝事件通力在中国北方掀起几十年来最大的问责风暴。至此,这已经不单单是一起经济事件。

但是,问责之后,我们的民族食品业就能够起死回生吗?一个士兵在救了一个盲人后被授予奖章,这枚奖章对这个盲人有意义么?同理,在问责力度上虽然显示了政府拯救民族食品业的努力,但是仅仅问责相关负责人并不能解决问题,我认为,只有深入探讨我们当前的市场体制,将企业真正放入市场竞争机制之下,让企业进入正常的竞争轨道,才能解决民族食品业的恶性循环。为了不再发生类似的食品安全事故,我渴望有关部门能够拿出壮士断腕的勇气来。只有那样,我们的民族食品业才有希望,才有未来。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2013-10-18
不好意思...英语水平有限...呵呵
Rice, Clenbuterol, Diao Baikuai the frequent, almost three meals a day so that the people who are on tenterhooks. However, the Ministry of Health published the other day in the first quarter of 2008 samples of food hygiene supervision and detection of specific information, you may be able to make on food hygiene and safety concerns about some of the slightly off.
In the first quarter of 2008, the Ministry of Health of the Organization of Hebei, Hunan, Sichuan, Shanghai, Guangxi, and other 21 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities on the market for health food sampling, and some of the pollutants in the food market, additives, heavy metals Some of the indicators of pollutants such as a special testing. Sampling and testing showed that one quarter of China's food hygiene in good condition.

It is reported that 9 of the sample 239 kinds of categories of food products, 232 kinds of qualified, qualified rate of 97.1 percent. Bottled water a total of 16 varieties of sampling, testing projects for the total number of bacteria, E. coli, yeast and mold, according to the state "pure bottled drinking water health standards" to judge all qualified. Food samples were all qualified monosodium glutamate, preserved vegetables, such as pasteurized milk. Milk drinks, frozen drinks, calcium to increase bone mineral density or type of health food can not reach all qualified, but the passing rate is quite high, reaching 93.8%, 80% and 97.9%.

In addition, additives, heavy metals, such as 13 kinds of pollutants commonly detected specific passing rate higher. Detection of 583 samples, 561 passing, the passing rate of 96.2 percent. The crabs, the detection of heavy metals, 10 samples of all qualified. 40 of jelly, cakes, bread, pickles preservatives testing samples of all qualified; on the market for 59 kinds of soy-alcohol test results are all qualified.

The discovery of the unqualified products, products to the health administrative departments have investigated and dealt with in accordance with the law carried out. The Ministry of Health said that in order to improve the effectiveness of supervision and management, all localities should take full advantage of the news media and electronic networks, announced in a timely manner the problems identified, and their integration into bad faith business files, to increase the frequency of supervision and punishment, as a warning to the production of illegal operators To protect the interests of consumers.
第2个回答  2013-10-18
Traditional and modern fast-food restaurants are essentially different. In comparison, traditional-style restaurant is a workshop, mainly to manual processing of a single shop, with management experience and modern civilization to the modern-style fast food is the definition of scale, standardization and modernization of relying on the chain management system. For example, both the Chinese snack foods, fast food or cuisine, both have a long history. Say that snack bars, the dumplings, pies, noodles, steamed stuffed bun, etc., which is not several hundred years of history? Lunch so many chicken-based material to the Lazi chicken, Wenchangji, Baiqieji, Shouxi chicken, stewed native chickens, and so on, which one tastes better than many of the Kentucky delicious peppery blue cheese dressing? But why now, Deng Daiyazhitang still difficult? The key lies not form standardization, standardization, and every restaurant to a Heart Association and found that many do not repeat mistakes of the matter.
Chinese fast fo
第3个回答  2013-10-18
Traditional plant breeding involves crossing varieties of the same species in ways they could cross naturally. For example, disease-resistant varieties of wheat have been crossed with high-yield wheat to combine these properties. This type of natural gene exchange is safe and fairly predictable.
Genetic engineering(GE)involves exchanging genes between unrelated species that cannot naturally exchange genes with each other. GE can involve the exchange of genes between vastly different species―e.g. putting scorpion toxin genes into maize or fish antifreeze genes into tomatoes. It is possible that a scorpion toxin gene, even when it is in maize DNA, will still get the organism to produce scorpion toxin―but what other effects may it have in this alien environment? We are already seeing this problem―adding human growth hormone genes to pigs certainly makes them grow―but it also gives them arthritis and makes them cross-eyed, which was entirely unpredictable.

It will be obvious, for example, that the gene for human intelligence will not have the same effect if inserted into cabbage DNA as it had in human DNA―but what side-effect would it have?In other words, is GM food safe to eat?The answer is that nobody knows because long-term tests have not been carried out.

Companies wanting a GM product approved in the UK or USA are required to provide regulatory bodies with results of their own safety tests. Monsanto’s soya beans were apparently fed to fish for10 weeks before being approved. There was no requirement for independent testing, for long-term testing, for testing on humans or testing for specific dangers to children or allergic people.  

The current position of the UK Government is that “There is no evidence of long-term dangers from GM foods.” In the US, the American Food and Drug Administration is currently being prosecuted for covering up research that suggested possible risks from GM foods.
相似回答