法律英语翻译

不要电脑翻的,谢谢~~
最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释(三)
第九条 劳动者主张加班费的,应当就加班事实的存在承担举证责任。但劳动者有证据证明用人单位掌握加班事实存在的证据,用人单位不提供的,由用人单位承担不利后果。
现行法律对追索加班费的案件举证并没有明确规定。在类似案件中,一般劳动者举证都比较困难,用人单位一般不会自觉拿出证据。该法条实际上是用法律手段督促用人单位拿出事实证据,维护劳动者的权益。同时,法条并没有倾向劳动者,用人单位举证的前提是劳动者有证据能够证明用人单位掌握加班事实存在的证据,这对于个别劳动者刻意刁难用人单位的行为也起到遏制作用。
对于加班行为,最高院认为企业生产经营也有淡季旺季之分,企业与职工通过平等协商,可以加班。用人单位让劳动者加班应支付加班费,但是加班要从劳动者的身体情况考虑,不能无度,不能强迫劳动者加班,劳动者有权拒绝加班.

The supreme people's court on the trial of labor dispute case applicable legal interpretation (3)
Article labourers shall claim the overtime work overtime, the existence of facts bear the burden. But there is evidence to prove that unit of choose and employ persons laborer master overtime evidence of facts, unit of choose and employ persons does not provide, the employing units shall bear the adverse consequences.
Current laws to recover the overtime did not make clear a regulation burden of cases. In a similar case, general laborer burden is more difficult, unit of choose and employ persons are generally not consciously out of evidence. The law is actually use legal means to urge to unit of choose and employ persons out facts, maintaining the rights and interests of labourers. At the same time, the law does not tend to laborer, unit of choose and employ persons is the premise of burden of proof of employee is unit of choose and employ persons master overtime evidence of fact, for this individual labourers sedulous bewilders unit of choose and employ persons also curb the behavior.
To work overtime, pp.290 think the production and operation of enterprises have slack season, enterprise and worker through consultations on an equal basis, to work overtime. Unit of choose and employ persons should pay overtime work overtime to laborer to work overtime, but from the body circumstance consideration, laborer can disorders, can compel employees to work overtime, the workers shall have the right to refuse to work overtime.
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2010-10-28
我的回答和上一个差不多啦!
The supreme people's court on the trial of labor dispute case applicable legal interpretation (3)
Article labourers shall claim the overtime work overtime, the existence of facts bear the burden. But there is evidence to prove that unit of choose and employ persons laborer master overtime evidence of facts, unit of choose and employ persons does not provide, the employing units shall bear the adverse consequences.
Current laws to recover the overtime did not make clear a regulation burden of cases. In a similar case, general laborer burden is more difficult, unit of choose and employ persons are generally not consciously out of evidence. The law is actually use legal means to urge to unit of choose and employ persons out facts, maintaining the rights and interests of labourers. At the same time, the law does not tend to laborer, unit of choose and employ persons is the premise of burden of proof of employee is unit of choose and employ persons master overtime evidence of fact, for this individual labourers sedulous bewilders unit of choose and employ persons also curb the behavior.
To work overtime, pp.290 think the production and operation of enterprises have slack season, enterprise and worker through consultations on an equal basis, to work overtime. Unit of choose and employ persons should pay overtime work overtime to laborer to work overtime, but from the body circumstance consideration, laborer can disorders, can compel employees to work overtime, the workers shall have the right to refuse to work overtime.