学校让写一篇英语作文,题目是“是否应该取消高考”,请大虾们帮忙翻译!

中文:首先,判断一个人素质高低,需要全方位考察,一张试卷不能决定任何事,考试素质只是文化素质中的一小部分,以这么偏的标准来衡量一个人,十分不全面,不能为人信服。
而且,考试的随机性很强,没有人能确保在那种压力下能发挥出正常水平。
此外,国家一再强调“素质教育”,但学校根本无法实行,原因是什么?还是考试。大人们讨论孩子前途,绝大多数都以分数来做标准,这样正确吗?取消了小升初考试,逐渐取消了中考,但是学生最终面对的是高考,这种压力依然不减,反而日渐增大,学生能否承受这样的社会压力?
在这一背景下,素质教育还会施行吗?当然不会!
所以我认为应该取消高考,给学生更多的选择余地,让他们选择自己的未来。

这篇作文的翻译如下。

First of all, judging a person's quality requires an all-round investigation. A test paper can't decide anything. The test quality is only a small part of the cultural quality. Measuring a person by such a biased standard is very incomplete and unconvincing.

Moreover, the randomness of the exam is very strong, and no one can ensure that they can play a normal level under that pressure.

In addition, the state has repeatedly emphasized "quality education", but schools can't implement it at all. What's the reason? Or an exam. When adults discuss children's future, most of them use scores as the standard. Is this correct? 

The junior high school entrance examination has been cancelled and the senior high school entrance examination has been cancelled gradually, but the students finally face the college entrance examination. 

This pressure is still not reduced, but increasing day by day. Can students bear such social pressure?

In this context, will quality education be implemented? Of course not!

So I think we should cancel the college entrance examination and give students more choices to choose their own future.

温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答  2021-09-23

First of all, judging a person's quality requires an all-round investigation. A test paper can't decide anything. The test quality is only a small part of the cultural quality. Measuring a person by such a biased standard is very incomplete and unconvincing.

首先,判断一个人素质高低,需要全方位考察,一张试卷不能决定任何事,考试素质只是文化素质中的一小部分,以这么偏的标准来衡量一个人,十分不全面,不能为人信服。

Moreover, the randomness of the exam is very strong, and no one can ensure that they can play a normal level under that pressure.

而且,考试的随机性很强,没有人能确保在那种压力下能发挥出正常水平。

In addition, the state has repeatedly emphasized "quality education", but schools can't implement it at all. What's the reason? Or an exam. When adults discuss children's future, most of them use scores as the standard.

此外,国家一再强调“素质教育”,但学校根本无法实行,原因是什么?还是考试。大人们讨论孩子前途,绝大多数都以分数来做标准。

 Is this correct? The junior high school entrance examination has been cancelled and the senior high school entrance examination has been cancelled gradually, but the students finally face the college entrance examination. This pressure is still not reduced, but increasing day by day. Can students bear such social pressure?

这样正确吗?取消了小升初考试,逐渐取消了中考,但是学生最终面对的是高考,这种压力依然不减,反而日渐增大,学生能否承受这样的社会压力?

In this context, will quality education be implemented? Of course not!

在这一背景下,素质教育还会施行吗?当然不会!

So I think we should cancel the college entrance examination and give students more choices to choose their own future.

所以我认为应该取消高考,给学生更多的选择余地,让他们选择自己的未来。

本回答被网友采纳
第2个回答  2011-04-10
First, judge of a man diathesis, need comprehensive investigation, a piece of paper can't decide anything, examination quality is just a small part of cultural quality, with such a partial standard to measure a person, it is not comprehensive, not a compelling.
And, an examination of the randomness is very strong, no one can ensure in that pressure can develop to normal levels.
In addition, the state education "repeatedly stressed that the" quality, but the school can't execute, and for what reason? Or examination. Adults and children's future discussion with the vast majority, such as the standard fraction to correct? Cancelled after examination, gradually cancelled tests, but students of the university entrance exam, eventually face pressure that is still not decreased, but increasingly increases, whether students take the social pressure?
In this context, the quality of education will also? Of course not!
So I think should cancel the university entrance exam, give students more options and let them choose their own future.本回答被提问者采纳