法律英语翻译 专业一点 急求

A third distinguishing feature of
environmental law-and this is a legal,rather than factual,characteristic-is
that environmental claims are rarely,if ever,raised in isolation of other
international legal arguments.In other words,the environmental law arguments
will almost always involve arguments about other substantive areas of the
law.such other areas include trade agreements in the WTO context,human rights
norms before human rights courts,and issues of general international law,such
as the relationships between treaty and custom,or the law of the environment
and the law of state responsibility.This combination suggests most strongly
that an international tribunal composed solely of experts in international
environmental law might not fare well in attracting cases.Therefore,what is
needed is a body of judges with a mix of general and specialized expertise.This
also explains why no cases thus far have been presented to the ICJ’s
Environment Chamber and,in my view,why none may ever do so:no two states will
agree that a given dispute is essentially “environmental”.

A fourth distinguishing feature,relating more
to issues raised before global bodies than regional bodies,is that the
international community does not yet have a common appreciation of where
environmental objectives stand in the general legal and political hierarchy.There
are understandable differences of view between developed and developing
countries as to what the priorities should be,and it seems clear that those
differences will also extend to the bench.There are equally sharp differences
of opinion between different regions,and evev between developed countries.For
example,the current debate over genetically modified organisms indicates that a
German judge may be more likely to be risk-averse and “precautionary” than an
American judge?

第三个特点
环境法律这是合法的,而不是事实,特点是
环境要求很少,如果有的话,在隔离的
国际法律观点。换句话说,环境法参数
将几乎总是涉及争论其他实质性的区域吗
法律。这样的其他领域包括贸易协定在WTO背景下,人权
规范人权法庭之前,和一般国际法的问题
条约和自定义之间的关系或法律环境
国家和法律责任。这种组合表明最为强烈
一个完全由国际专家组成的国际法庭
环境法在吸引情况下可能也不是很好。因此,什么是
需要的是一个身体的法官一般和专业expertise.This
也解释了为什么没有提交给国际法庭案件迄今为止
环境室,在我看来,两个国家为什么没有这样做过:没有
同意,一个给定的纠纷本质上是“环境”。

第四个特点,相关的更多
前问题全球身体比区域机构,是
国际社会还没有一个共同的升值
环境目标站在法律和政治hierarchy.There
发达国家和发展中之间是可以理解不同的观点
国家优先考虑的应该是什么,很明显,这些东西
差异还将扩展到替补席上。有同样尖锐分歧
不同地区之间的意见,发达国家countries.For之间的屋里
例子中,当前的转基因生物的争论表明,
德国法官更有可能比一个厌恶风险,“预防”
美国法官吗?
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考